In Bangkok, Thailand, a proposal for extensive revisions to fisheries laws has ignited concerns among critics, who argue that the changes may lead to reduced penalties for illegal fishing and weaken protections for workers. This potential reversal of progress, made over recent years, poses significant risks not only to the welfare of laborers but also to the substantial trade revenues associated with the fishing industry. Critics warn that such amendments could usher in a “new era of slaves,” amplifying fears of illegal fishing practices and forced labor within Thailand’s fisheries sector.
The proposed changes to Thailand’s fisheries laws encompass several significant alterations, including the reduction of penalties for illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities. Additionally, the deregulation of destructive fishing gears, such as trawling nets, is on the agenda. Another concerning aspect is the reintroduction of the banned practice of transshipment of seafood at sea, a move that could facilitate illegal activities and evade oversight. Furthermore, the relaxation of regulations pertaining to the capture of protected marine species is proposed, raising alarm about the potential impact on marine biodiversity and ecosystems. These proposed amendments have sparked widespread apprehension among stakeholders, with opponents voicing concerns about the potential negative repercussions on both environmental sustainability and the rights and welfare of workers in the fishing industry.
Jail terms would be eliminated for all IUU offences and some fines could be decreased by 98 per cent. For example, the maximum fine for fishing in a marine protected area could be reduced from approximately US$825,000 currently to just US$13,750.
The Thai parliament is currently considering the raft of new bills from different political parties in the government and opposition.While different parties and the national cabinet have proposed different law changes, which are currently being negotiated, they agree that the current legislation is too strict on commercial fishers.
